I was displeased when I saw this Google Analytics map of the site visitors to The Bilerico Project, because of it’s inaccurate depiction of Michigan as a single, strange lump rather than two peninsulas separated by the largest bodies of fresh water in the world. Now, I can imagine that Google Analytics choose to depict Michigan in this way in order to avoid confusion about the two peninsulas being separate states. And I admit that it is partially native pride in Michigan’s unique shape that inspires my concern. But, seriously, in a nation that is embarrassingly geographically illiterate and dangerously ecologically unaware, do we really want to create maps that inaccurately erase enormous, irreplaceable lakes that are facing multiple, serious crises?
Tags: ecological awareness, Great Lakes, maps, michigan
December 4, 2007 at 12:12 am |
I saw that and thought the same thing!
While Michigan got it the worst, Florida’s keys became a fat peninsula, Long Island is attached to the mainland, and Massachusetts’ famous cape is just a blob.
And that’s not even getting into the world map!
December 4, 2007 at 8:34 am |
True, true. You should see the world map. Cartography was not their main concern, let me tell you…
December 17, 2007 at 10:34 am |
Yeah, I agree with your comments, and with Alex’s comments. While this could be geographic illitieracy, it has implications in its meanings. We need to protect our water and our landforms.
Have you read Great Lakes Water Wars yet????
If not, do so.
Then read about the Pacific coastline, as you will be there soon.
Loves!